In a post on X, @pengsonal reports that OpenCode pages for five possible upcoming AI models appeared through the site’s sitemap. The reported names are GLM 5.5 Flash, GLM 5.4, Kimi K4, DeepSeek V4.1 Pro and Muse Spark 1.4.
The report says the pages remained live after the entries were removed from the sitemap. The available evidence does not independently establish that all five pages were live, that they appeared in an OpenCode sitemap, or that the names represent genuine upcoming releases.
The five models named in the report
The post pairs each name with an OpenCode data path:
Kimi K4, under Moonshot
GLM 5.5 Flash, under Zhipu
GLM 5.4, under Zhipu
DeepSeek V4.1 Pro, under DeepSeek
Muse Spark 1.4, under Meta
These names and path pairings are reported details, not confirmation that the associated companies have announced the models. The report does not establish their capabilities, benchmarks, pricing, release dates or availability.
What the Kimi K4 page appears to show
The supplied screenshot appears to show a dark OpenCode DATA page with the breadcrumb “Data / Moonshot / kimi-k4” and a large “kimi-k4” label. The visible text says it was ranked “--” across the previous week’s OpenCode usage, with 0% of observed volume and a displayed 2M volume figure for the period shown.
Image credit: @pengsonal on X
Those details describe what is visible in the supplied image; they do not independently verify the broader five-model report. The screenshot also does not establish that Kimi K4 had been officially announced, released or made available to users.
Why a sitemap listing is not an official release
A sitemap is a list of pages that a website makes discoverable to search engines and other visitors. If the reported entries appeared there, that could indicate that OpenCode had generated or exposed pages associated with the names. It would not, by itself, explain why the pages existed or confirm that the companies behind the names had announced products.
The report’s description of pages remaining live after sitemap removal also leaves several possibilities unresolved. The entries could have been public pages, temporary records, internal placeholders, mistaken additions or something else. The available evidence does not show which explanation is correct.
What remains unconfirmed
The available material does not confirm:
that all five pages were accessible or live when reported;
that the names were actually exposed through an OpenCode sitemap;
that OpenCode removed the entries from its sitemap;
that the five names refer to upcoming models rather than placeholders or mistaken entries;
any model capabilities, benchmarks, pricing or release dates; or
availability from Moonshot, Zhipu, DeepSeek or Meta.
There is also no supplied official response from OpenCode or the companies associated with the reported names. For now, the report is best understood as an unconfirmed listing of five model names, with the Kimi K4 screenshot providing limited visual evidence of one OpenCode data page rather than confirmation of an official release.
0 comments
No approved comments yet. You can start the conversation.
Leave a comment