In a post on X, @nima_owji says X is working on a unified subscription called XPASS that could combine access to X, Grok, Cursor and Grok Bot. The report describes four proposed tiers—Premium, Plus, Super and Ultra—but does not establish that X has announced, launched or priced any of them.
The accompanying graphic shows a subscription-page design with placeholder prices, monthly and annual billing options, and different feature lists for each tier. The status of that graphic is unconfirmed.
Image credit: @nima_owji on X
What the XPASS report says
The post presents XPASS as one subscription intended to cover the four named services: X, Grok, Cursor and Grok Bot. It does not explain how those services would share an account, subscription entitlement or usage allowance.
The graphic describes the proposed bundle in more detail. Its Premium column appears to include a shared usage pool across all products, along with Grok Chat, Voice, Imagine and Build, the Grok API, and Cursor. It does not clarify how Cursor access would work or whether the named services would draw from one shared usage pool.
How the four proposed XPASS tiers differ
The source describes the following progression. These are reported or displayed details, not confirmed plans.
Proposed tier | Reported or displayed usage | Reported or displayed additions |
|---|---|---|
Premium | Introductory plan; no multiplier stated | X benefits, plus a shared usage pool across products and access to several listed Grok services and Cursor in the graphic |
Plus | 4x usage compared with Premium | Grok Bot in the post; the graphic also shows ad-free scrolling, a preferred @handle, a higher reply boost, newer Grok models, faster chat responses, AI image and video creation, cloud agents and automations, and Bugbot and Origin |
Super | 15x usage compared with Premium | The graphic shows 1080p video creation, priority model access at peak times, and faster responses and generations |
Ultra | 50x usage compared with Premium | The graphic shows access to the most powerful chat models, earliest access to products and models, and the fastest responses and generations |
The image also lists a range of X features under Premium, including fewer timeline ads, a premium checkmark, paid posting, post editing, longer posts and videos, higher posting limits, advanced analytics, bookmark folders, video downloads and higher direct-message limits. The Plus column appears to carry those benefits forward and add further X and AI features.
What the usage multipliers do—and do not—tell readers
The reported figures are relative multipliers: Plus is described as offering four times Premium usage, Super 15 times Premium usage and Ultra 50 times Premium usage. They are not absolute quotas. The post and graphic do not define the underlying Premium allowance, the billing period or what counts as one unit of usage.
It is also unclear whether the allowance would apply separately to X, Grok, Cursor and Grok Bot, or whether all of them would draw from one shared pool. A shared pool could let usage in one service reduce what remains for another, while separate limits would work differently. The report does not resolve that distinction.
The multipliers therefore cannot be used to calculate how many prompts, images, videos, API requests or Cursor tasks a subscriber might receive. They also do not establish that the listed models or features would be available at the same limits across every service.
What remains unconfirmed
The report does not provide actual prices, despite the graphic showing price placeholders. It also does not provide a launch date, availability information, regional eligibility, subscription terms or evidence that any of the four tiers can be purchased.
The post and graphic do not say whether XPASS is a confirmed internal product, a planned offering that could change or a concept represented by the design. They likewise do not explain how access to Cursor would work, whether Grok Bot would be a separate product entitlement or how the proposed shared usage would be measured.
For now, XPASS is best understood as an unverified report about a possible unified subscription. The proposed tier names and relative usage levels describe the direction shown in the source, not an available pricing or feature comparison.
0 comments
No approved comments yet. You can start the conversation.
Leave a comment