A clarification circulating on X says Codex resets restore a user’s full allocation, rejecting a claim that users receive less than the complete amount after a reset. The clarification was posted by @Conor_D_Dart and says the point was confirmed by @thsottiaux and the company.
What the clarification says
The message addresses a post that had apparently circulated on X and Reddit claiming that Codex resets were not complete. Its response is direct: resets are “full resets” and users receive the full allocation.
That means the clarification disputes the idea that a reset leaves users with a reduced allowance, partial credit or some other withheld portion. It does not describe a change to Codex’s limits or introduce a new reset policy; it presents the reset behaviour as the intended one.
What Codex users should take away
Users trying to understand their available Codex usage should treat the claim about incomplete resets as false according to this clarification. After a reset, the stated expectation is that the full allocation is available again.
The supplied post does not include further technical details about how resets are timed or displayed, and it does not reproduce the original claim in full. Its useful contribution is narrower: it closes the specific dispute over whether a reset restores the complete allocation.
